Week 2, day 2 at RC
My body is craving some dancing and exercising. I had signed up for a flexibility class this morning (I want to get my splits back and improve my back flexibility) but I got there too late! I thought I had padded my commute time generously enough, but apparently not. Anything can happen with the NYC subways (e.g., the M train turns into a J train at some point).
Today I caught myself having destructive thoughts such as “everyone here is so good and is getting stuff done and is studying a Lisp language seriously… and I’m not!” But I know it is very common, so I try not to worry and just keep going with my day. Today, I had to follow up on a few things related to my paid work, as well as my banking and housing situations.
So, it’s frustrating that I could not join the group of RCers who gathered to listen (live) to Mark Zuckerberg testifying before the US Senate but, well, there are only 24 hours in a day. Kudos to Ethan for coming up with this initiative though! I started reading about hash tables to refresh my understanding, but I did not actually participate in the post-lunch prep problems (which Bryan awesomely curates every day).
I picked up my JavaScript
work in progress
where I had left it. I was confronted with typing questions again, since our
RGB values are not stored in just any array, but in a typed
Uint8ClampedArray
.
I definitely don’t want to be casual about converting its [0, 255]-range
integers into strings… Hence the
discussion.
This brought up more general thoughts about collaboration (in principle and in
practice).
I was delighted to learn about GitHub’s co-authorship support from Danielle, who learnt it from other RCers! I love co-authoring. As I have previously shared in private communication, I don’t agree with the old dusty traditional academic thinking that co-authorship would be less prestigious than authorship; actually, I have opposite views: I feel honoured to co-author with my colleagues and collaborators (in this case, Danielle).